An Analytical View of the Jurisprudence and Jurisprudence Scope of Iranian Judicial Courts
Volume 1, Issue 3, 2019, Page 0 - 0
Authors : mohsenkarami
Abstract :
Disputes have not been discussed separately among jurisprudents, both Sunni and Shiite, and are only implied in some cases. This matter has been neglected in the laws of Iran and the case law, and most jurists have not spoken in detail about the laws as well as the jurisprudents. Ignorance of property under the heading \"Property deprivation\" is the owner\'s indefinite rights as well as one of the types of decisions and seizures of the owner with respect to his property rights. Deprivation of property has been a controversial issue in property and property law, as a matter of private property and as a matter of deprivation of property and rights. The denial of property rights in Imamiyah jurisprudence has not been independently discussed, and jurisprudents have reported on some jurisprudential occasions, such as abandoning property or camels due to desertification, desertification, shipwreck, and other issues. Have pointed it out. Article 178 of the Civil Code states that the owner\'s deeds are conditioned on the possibil- ity of possessing the property by another means of bringing it out of the sea. Muscat is a well-known jurist, but there is disagreement about the validity of it. In this article, it is explained that in addition to the rational course, the narrations also point to the validity of the Muscat, although most of the jurisprudents have undermined the documents and implications of these traditions and have not included them in this sense. In addition, by inducting legal and jurisprudential texts, we will discuss the characteristics and instances of absurdity.
Disputes have not been discussed separately among jurisprudents, both Sunni and Shiite, and are only implied in some cases. This matter has been neglected in the laws of Iran and the case law, and most jurists have not spoken in detail about the laws as well as the jurisprudents. Ignorance of property under the heading \"Property deprivation\" is the owner\'s indefinite rights as well as one of the types of decisions and seizures of the owner with respect to his property rights. Deprivation of property has been a controversial issue in property and property law, as a matter of private property and as a matter of deprivation of property and rights. The denial of property rights in Imamiyah jurisprudence has not been independently discussed, and jurisprudents have reported on some jurisprudential occasions, such as abandoning property or camels due to desertification, desertification, shipwreck, and other issues. Have pointed it out. Article 178 of the Civil Code states that the owner\'s deeds are conditioned on the possibil- ity of possessing the property by another means of bringing it out of the sea. Muscat is a well-known jurist, but there is disagreement about the validity of it. In this article, it is explained that in addition to the rational course, the narrations also point to the validity of the Muscat, although most of the jurisprudents have undermined the documents and implications of these traditions and have not included them in this sense. In addition, by inducting legal and jurisprudential texts, we will discuss the characteristics and instances of absurdity.
Keywords :
Violations, Property Rights, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence, Article 178 of the Civil Code, Instances of Violations
Violations, Property Rights, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence, Article 178 of the Civil Code, Instances of Violations
Article View
1,315
PDF Download
1